Our thoughts are in a continuous flow.
Note that we take some of our thoughts as "just thoughts" as we.
"The truth" other than under Why we thought, 'There should be
different "or" It could be different, "to be true, and not just
a thought?
If you're like me, you can not find in
your immediate and direct experience, no reason to conclude that "it could
/ should be different" is the truth. In other words, we have assumed that
the true faith! Why not treat it as a simple thought that we find that it is
grounded in the reality of our direct experience?
Ask yourself: "What's the" It
"in" should / could be different Can you do something different from
your direct experience now no "understanding"?
It is easy to see that someone would
want to experience this moment, to be different, as the experiment is very
painful. However, it should or could be different just because we want it?
Really?
